1776Reporting
The Biden administration’s latest climate policy has ignited widespread concern, particularly among low-income and elderly populations. The regulation, set to ban certain natural gas water heaters by 2029, has been described as a double-edged sword—promising environmental benefits while potentially driving up costs for vulnerable consumers.
Under the proposed rule, non-condensing, natural gas-fired water heaters will no longer be available for sale. The Department of Energy (DOE) quietly announced this decision with minimal fanfare, releasing the policy details after Christmas. The motivation: reducing carbon dioxide emissions as part of the administration’s broader climate agenda.
Industry Impact: A Shift in Manufacturing
If implemented, the regulation would remove nearly 40% of tankless water heaters currently on the market, according to the Appliance Standards Awareness Project. Frank Windsor, president of Rinnai America, expressed frustration over the sweeping impact on manufacturers.
“When the rule goes into effect, all that manufacturing will basically be irrelevant,” Windsor said. His company recently invested $70 million in a Georgia facility to produce non-condensing models, now facing obsolescence.
The DOE’s new standards require tankless gas water heaters to use 13% less energy than the least efficient models available today. While the rules don’t explicitly outlaw non-condensing units, only condensing models meet the heightened efficiency criteria.
Costs and Consumer Burden
Critics argue that the policy could disproportionately burden low-income families and senior citizens who often rely on tankless technology in smaller housing spaces. These models, known for their affordability and efficiency, might be replaced with pricier alternatives.
A non-condensing tankless water heater, such as Rinnai America’s model, costs approximately $1,000 at Home Depot. In contrast, a comparable condensing version is priced around $1,800—nearly double the upfront expense.
“Forcing low-income and senior customers to pay far more upfront is particularly concerning,” said Matthew Agen, the American Gas Association’s chief counsel for energy. He emphasized that the long-term savings projected by the DOE—roughly $112 over 20 years—fall short of justifying the steep initial investment.
“The final rule is a violation of the Energy Policy and Conservation Act (EPCA), which prohibits DOE from promulgating a standard that renders a product with a distinct performance characteristic unavailable,” Agen added.
Environmental Advocates Applaud the Move
Not everyone is critical of the DOE’s decision. Environmental groups, such as the Appliance Standards Awareness Project, lauded the policy for its potential to cut 32 million metric tons of carbon dioxide emissions over the next 30 years.
“This is a commonsense step that will lower total household costs while reducing planet-warming emissions,” said Andrew deLaski, the project’s executive director. “These long-awaited standards will ensure more families save with proven energy-efficient technology already used in a majority of tankless units.”
Future Policy Challenges
The upcoming administration could challenge the regulation. President-elect Donald Trump, set to take office on Jan. 20, has expressed interest in reversing some of President Biden’s climate policies. Trump has nominated Chris Wright, CEO of Liberty Energy, as his Secretary of Energy, signaling a potential pivot in energy strategy.
While advocates champion the environmental benefits of the ban, critics warn that it places undue financial strain on those least equipped to shoulder it. As the debate continues, the broader implications of balancing affordability with climate action remain at the forefront of the discussion.
GIPHY App Key not set. Please check settings