Israel’s recent airstrike on Iran has sent a strong message, showing that they control the skies over Tehran. The strike, carried out on October 26, was Israel’s response to a ballistic missile attack from Iran earlier in the month. The operation demonstrated Israel’s military prowess and precision, using advanced tactics to achieve its objectives.
Satellite images from Planet Labs now reveal the extent of the damage caused by the Israeli airstrike. Two key military facilities in Iran, both believed to be critical for missile and drone production, were hit hard. The images show several buildings completely destroyed, highlighting the precision and effectiveness of the attack. These facilities were instrumental in Iran’s missile and drone manufacturing capabilities, meaning the strike likely dealt a serious blow to Iran’s military production.
In total, Israel deployed around 100 aircraft for the mission. F-15s and F-16s, often associated with combat missions, were primarily used to refuel Israel’s F-35 stealth fighters, which likely executed the actual airstrikes. This multi-faceted approach demonstrates the complexity and coordination of Israel’s military strategy.
Before entering Iranian airspace, Israel reportedly disabled radar and air defenses in Iraq and Syria, clearing the path for their aircraft. Once over Iran, the Israeli Air Force faced little resistance, as F-35 stealth fighters can easily evade the outdated anti-aircraft artillery that Iran used in response. There is video footage showing Iran’s anti-aircraft fire, but it was ineffective against Israel’s advanced jets.
Perhaps the most striking aspect of this operation is not just the military success but the clear message Israel sent. Israeli jets were in Iranian airspace for hours, unchallenged, with the capability to do much more damage if desired. Israel’s choice to limit its attack scope suggests it is reserving the option for further action if needed. In addition to the drone and missile sites, Israel targeted about 20 military locations, including radar stations and Russian-supplied air defense systems. By doing so, they weakened Iran’s defenses for any future encounters.
This calculated restraint leaves room for escalation. Israel avoided nuclear or energy targets, suggesting they could still take more severe action if Iran retaliates. Initially, Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei downplayed the attack, urging people not to “exaggerate or downplay” the strike, signaling that he didn’t want a full-scale war with Israel. However, the Iranian Foreign Ministry later stated that Iran would use “all available tools” to respond.
Despite the tough rhetoric, Iran’s actual options for retaliation seem limited. The Israeli Defense Minister has stated that Iran’s proxies, Hamas in Gaza and Hezbollah in Lebanon, are no longer capable of launching effective attacks. Iran’s Air Force is far inferior to Israel’s, and the strike severely disrupted their missile and drone capabilities.
While Iran’s leaders may continue to speak of retaliation, there’s a growing belief that the cycle of tit-for-tat strikes between these two nations may be reaching its end. With Iran’s options dwindling and Israel showing its dominance in the skies, the dynamics of the conflict appear to be shifting in Israel’s favor. Israel’s recent operation was a clear demonstration of strength, sending a powerful signal to Iran and the region that any aggression will be met with overwhelming force.
GIPHY App Key not set. Please check settings