in ,

Could 9/11 Terrorists Walk Free? Pentagon’s Appeal Could Change Everything!

The U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) is pushing back against a recent military judge’s decision to reinstate plea deals for three men accused of being involved in the 9/11 terrorist attacks. The plea deals, which would spare them from the death penalty, have sparked controversy.

On November 8, the Pentagon announced it would fight to delay the guilty plea hearings. This statement came in response to months of legal wrangling between the DoD, the Office of Military Commissions (OMC), and the defense attorneys for Khalid Sheikh Mohammed — the alleged mastermind behind the September 11 attacks — along with his co-conspirators, Walid Muhammad Salih Mubarak Bin Attash and Mustafa Ahmed Adam al Hawsawi.

The Department of Defense is appealing a military judge’s ruling that would allow 9/11 terrorists — including mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed — to accept a plea deal. EPA
Walid Muhammad Salih Mubarak Bin Attash is also involved in the judge’s decision. AP
Mustafa Ahmed Adam al Hawsawi is the third terrorist that would accept the plea deal.

The three men have been detained at the U.S. military prison in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, since 2003.

The legal agreement struck by their defense attorneys and the military prosecutors caused a stir when it was revealed on July 31. The plea deals stated that the men would plead guilty to their roles in the attacks, but in return, they would be spared from facing the death penalty. This deal angered the families of 9/11 victims, who had waited for justice for more than two decades. For many, the death penalty was the only fitting punishment for those responsible for the deadliest terrorist attack on U.S. soil.

The plea deal would allow the terrorists responsible for the 9/11 attacks to avoid the death penalty. Tamara Beckwith/New York Post

Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin responded to the backlash on August 2, stating that he was withdrawing the plea deals. His decision offered a glimmer of hope to victims’ families, who believed the legal process might be moving closer to delivering the justice they had long desired.

However, on November 6, a military judge ruled that Austin did not have the authority to cancel the plea agreements. The judge declared the deals “valid and enforceable,” allowing the guilty pleas to proceed. This ruling set the stage for future hearings, although no dates have been confirmed yet.

The New York Post’s cover on the plea deal. csuarez

In response, the Pentagon vowed to challenge the ruling. In its letter to victims’ families, the Defense Department said it would seek to postpone any hearings and would challenge the decision before the U.S. Court of Military Commission Review.

The battle over these plea agreements continues, as the DoD and victims’ families clash over how justice will be served for the perpetrators of one of the most tragic events in American history.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

GIPHY App Key not set. Please check settings

The One Thing About This Hockey Fan That Had the Crowd Going Wild!

What Happens to Your Body After Death? Hospice Nurse Reveals the Jaw-Dropping Reality!