1776Reporting
Turkey’s plans for a northern Syria invasion risk igniting a new conflict, threatening the fragile balance in the region. The Kurdish-led Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF), a key U.S. ally that fought ISIS, are now in Erdogan’s crosshairs, raising alarm among U.S. lawmakers and defense experts.
The SDF, responsible for taking down ISIS in 2019, faces relentless attacks from Turkish-backed forces. “The Kobani frontlines are subjected constantly to Turkish armed drones and artillery targeting,” an SDF source revealed, noting no external support aside from limited U.S.-led mediation efforts. Pro-Turkish groups like the Syrian National Army are reportedly mobilizing to encircle Kobani, escalating tensions.
Senator John Kennedy urged Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan to back off, declaring, “Leave the Kurds alone. The Kurds are America’s friends…most responsible for destroying ISIS.” Kennedy warned Congress would act, hinting at economic sanctions that could destabilize Turkey’s already shaky economy.
Erdogan’s Strategic Gamble
Turkey’s President, closely aligned with the nationalist MHP party, views the SDF as an offshoot of the PKK, a group Turkey and its allies classify as a terrorist organization. Despite this, Simone Ledeen, a former U.S. defense official, stressed the importance of supporting the SDF. “The U.S. must reinforce support…while addressing the reality that Turkey…is enabling a rapidly expanding jihadist threat.”
Turkey denies targeting Syrian Kurds and claims its actions are aimed solely at combating terrorist groups. A Foreign Ministry spokesman argued, “The Syrian people…are striving to expel the PKK/YPG/‘SDF’ terrorist organization, which has long occupied their territories.”
Rising Risk of ISIS Resurgence
Amid the conflict, concerns grow over the fate of 10,000 ISIS prisoners held by the SDF. The need to redeploy fighters to defend against Turkish aggression jeopardizes the security of these detainees. Counter-terrorism experts warn that renewed instability in northern Syria could embolden ISIS, with severe global security implications.
The Biden administration’s handling of Turkey’s aggression has drawn criticism. The State Department emphasized the importance of de-escalation, stating, “This is a time to increase stability, not to further devolve into fighting.”
Bipartisan Push for Sanctions
Senators Chris Van Hollen and Lindsey Graham introduced the “Countering Turkish Aggression Act of 2024” to push for sanctions against Turkey. The goal is to secure a ceasefire and establish a demilitarized zone in northern Syria.
Expert Shukriya Bradost suggested a path forward, advocating U.S.-brokered negotiations between Turkey and the Kurdish administration. “A cooperative relationship could serve both Turkish and Kurdish interests,” she explained, referencing Turkey’s past economic collaboration with Kurdish authorities in Iraq. Bradost likened the potential agreement to the transformative Abraham Accords.
Humanitarian and Geopolitical Stakes
The ongoing conflict threatens not only Kurdish autonomy but also the stability of Syria as a whole. Damage to critical infrastructure, like the Tishreen Dam, has raised fears of a humanitarian crisis.
As Erdoğan continues his campaign, the U.S. faces mounting pressure to take decisive action. The question remains: Will Washington step up to protect its allies and preserve stability in the region, or will it allow the conflict to spiral further out of control?
GIPHY App Key not set. Please check settings