Ex-CNN Analyst Drops a Bombshell on Harris Campaign!

In a recent discussion, former CNN analyst Chris Cillizza put forth a provocative argument regarding the Democratic Party’s decision-making processes in choosing Vice President Kamala Harris as the presumptive nominee. He asserted that Harris’s selection was significantly influenced by her identity as a Black woman rather than her political experience or electability. This claim has sparked a considerable amount of debate, particularly among conservative circles.

The Context of Harris’s Nomination

Cillizza’s analysis, shared on his YouTube channel, highlighted the unique set of circumstances leading to Harris’s rise as the presumptive nominee for the Democratic Party. He argued that if the decision had been made “in a vacuum,” Democrats might not have chosen Harris due to her limited support from primary voters and her political track record. Instead, her nomination was largely driven by party insiders who prioritized diversity and representation in leadership roles.

In his words, “I think you need to win the Midwest and Pennsylvania to get elected president if you’re a Democrat. And I think Harris is, at best, an even money bet to win those states. I think she probably has as much a chance as pre-debate Biden. So she can win, but it’s no lock … But the realities of the way the Democratic Party works, the vice president of the United States, who is a black woman, is not going to be the nominee.”

Ex-CNN Analyst Says Dems Wouldn't Have Picked Harris 'In A Vacuum' But Had To Because She's 'Black Woman' VP pic.twitter.com/HexCVTQX6b

— Daily Caller (@DailyCaller) July 26, 2024

The Urgency of the Situation

Cillizza pointed out the urgency faced by the Democratic Party following President Joe Biden’s unexpected withdrawal. With the Democratic National Convention looming and limited time to select a new candidate, Harris emerged as the default choice due to her current role as vice president. “In a situation like this, in a situation where it’s like the president says he’s not running again, the convention is in a month, they have to pick really fast, she’s going to win,” he explained. “Even if it was an open convention, which it’s not really going to be … she would’ve won anyway. But is she the best candidate in a vacuum if the Democrats could pick anyone with no repercussions? No, she is not.”

Exploring Alternatives

The former CNN analyst responded to a viewer’s inquiry about whether a ticket featuring two Rust Belt governors would be more effective than having Harris as the vice president. He suggested that under normal circumstances, Democrats might have considered nominating Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer or Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro. Harris, he argued, has “limited experience,” a “far-left voting record,” and carries “border crisis baggage.” These factors contribute to the belief that other candidates might have been more appealing to voters in critical swing states.

Media Bias and Its Impact

The conversation about Harris’s candidacy also extends to the media’s portrayal of her political standing. Fox News “The Five” co-host Jesse Watters criticized the mainstream media for what he perceives as a pro-Democrat bias, particularly in recasting Harris as a viable presidential candidate. Watters argued that the media’s favorable coverage has skewed public perception, making the race against former President Donald Trump closer than it should be.

“It’s going to be close. And if we had a fair press, this would be a landslide. Democrats would never win another national election again if we had a fair press,” Watters stated. He further criticized the media’s handling of Harris’s record, suggesting that key issues have been downplayed or ignored in favor of presenting her in a more positive light. “Three months before the election, this woman comes out, and she has a record that says I want to get rid of ICE, private health care, guns, and then says, actually, I don’t believe any of that,” he added.

The Broader Implications

The debate surrounding Kamala Harris’s candidacy underscores broader discussions about identity politics, media bias, and the dynamics of political decision-making within the Democratic Party. While Harris’s identity as a Black woman holds significant symbolic value, critics argue that her qualifications and electoral viability should also be carefully scrutinized.

As the political landscape continues to evolve, the conversation about Harris’s role in the Democratic Party serves as a reminder of the complex interplay between identity, politics, and media influence. Whether she will ultimately succeed in securing the presidency remains uncertain, but the discussion surrounding her candidacy is likely to persist as a focal point of political discourse in the coming months.