1776Reporting
Chelsea Clinton has her eyes set on a high-profile diplomatic position, specifically the ambassadorship to the United Kingdom, according to a report from the New York Post. The potential move hinges on Vice President Kamala Harris winning the presidency, a possibility that has garnered significant attention within political circles. Clinton’s ambition is supported by her family’s longstanding influence and connections, particularly within the Democratic Party.
Clinton’s Ambitions and Strategic Endorsements
A source close to the Clinton family revealed to the New York Post, “Chelsea really wants to be the ambassador to the UK. There’s a reason why Bill and Hillary came out in the first five minutes to support Kamala’s presidential bid — they were currying favor.” This statement suggests that the Clintons’ quick endorsement of Harris was part of a strategic maneuver to secure future political advantages, including Chelsea’s potential ambassadorship.
The Clintons have been prominent figures in the Democratic Party for decades, wielding considerable influence. Their immediate support for Harris contrasts with reported tensions within the party’s leadership, as hinted by multiple sources. The same insider told the New York Post that Bill and Hillary have been “working on this idea for a long time,” indicating a well-thought-out plan to position Chelsea for a significant diplomatic role.
The Politics of Ambassadorships
Ambassadorships to key allies such as the United Kingdom and France are typically awarded to top political allies and donors. In 2022, President Joe Biden appointed Jane Hartley, a major Democratic Party donor, as the U.K. ambassador. Hartley’s appointment exemplifies the longstanding tradition of rewarding significant campaign contributors with prestigious diplomatic positions.
Hartley is known as a “bundler,” a term used to describe someone who solicits and coordinates substantial contributions to political campaigns from groups of donors. Despite President Biden’s campaign promise to end the practice of awarding ambassadorships based on donations, reports indicate that over one-third of his picks were former bundlers.
Chelsea Clinton’s Connections and Qualifications
The Clinton family hopes to continue this trend, with Chelsea Clinton being a prime candidate for such an appointment. Currently serving as vice chair of the Clinton Foundation, Chelsea has expressed interest in the ambassadorship to France as well. Her educational background, which includes degrees from the prestigious Oxford University in the U.K., adds to her appeal as a candidate for the ambassadorship.
“I can well imagine that the UK ambassadorship is an aspiration for Chelsea, although she is a bit junior still — and London usually goes to a massive donor or fundraiser,” a longtime British embassy official told the New York Post. This insight underscores the competitive nature of securing such a position, often reserved for individuals with extensive fundraising experience or significant political contributions.
Another source close to the Clinton family stated that Chelsea, 44, has long had her eye on a prestigious diplomatic post. The source remarked, “Foreign countries love high-profile people as ambassadors because it brings them more attention. They would rather have someone more famous and less rich.” Chelsea’s prominence and connections make her a viable candidate, despite the competitive selection process.
Personal Aspirations and Legacy
Chelsea Clinton’s aspirations extend beyond political maneuvering; she is motivated by a desire to create her own legacy. “She is 44 and has a long-held ambition for this. It’s important for her to have her own legacy,” said a knowledgeable insider. “She has always wanted to spend more time abroad, much like Caroline Kennedy” — the current ambassador to Australia and former ambassador to Japan under President Obama. This comparison highlights Chelsea’s ambition to follow in the footsteps of other prominent figures who have successfully transitioned to diplomatic roles.
While the Clintons’ endorsement of Kamala Harris may be viewed by some as a strategic move to secure Chelsea’s future, not everyone agrees with this interpretation. A second source close to the family dismissed the notion, stating, “Among stupid things said by clueless people, that’s pretty high up there.” This comment suggests that while the endorsement may benefit Chelsea’s ambitions, it was not necessarily the primary motivation behind the Clintons’ support for Harris.
Chelsea Clinton’s potential appointment as ambassador to the U.K. reflects a blend of personal ambition, family legacy, and strategic political maneuvering. As the political landscape evolves and Kamala Harris’s presidential prospects develop, Chelsea’s diplomatic aspirations may yet come to fruition, showcasing the enduring influence of the Clinton family in American politics.
GIPHY App Key not set. Please check settings