1776Reporting
Rep. Claudia Tenney, R-N.Y., has reignited a fierce debate over state policies and immigration with the reintroduction of her bill targeting federal highway funding. Named the Red Light Act, the legislation aims to penalize states like New York that issue driver’s licenses and ID cards to undocumented immigrants by stripping their federal highway funding.
Speaking on the bill’s purpose, Tenney said, “Our nation is grappling with an unprecedented migrant crisis, yet some states, like New York, are incentivizing and rewarding criminals with driver’s licenses and identification cards.” She further accused such policies of enabling “dangerous individuals to roam freely in our country” while obstructing immigration enforcement.
Controversial Green Light Law Under Scrutiny
New York’s Green Light Law, passed in 2019 and signed by former Gov. Andrew Cuomo, allows undocumented immigrants to obtain driver’s licenses. The law also prevents federal agencies like Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) from accessing state Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) records without a court order. Proponents argue that it improves road safety and prevents racial profiling, but critics claim it undermines immigration enforcement and jeopardizes public safety.
Trump’s incoming border czar, Tom Homan, an outspoken critic of the law, floated a dramatic countermeasure: blocking vehicles with New York plates from crossing the U.S.-Canada border unless the law is repealed. “To me, this is a high priority,” Homan told the Buffalo News. “What happens in New York means a lot to me.”
New York Gov. Kathy Hochul dismissed Homan’s proposal as impractical. “That would be bizarre to me that anyone thinks that stopping our vehicles from coming in and out of our country, keeping New Yorkers in a foreign country, is a smart path forward,” Hochul said during a press conference, adding she would welcome a discussion on the matter.
Funding Tied to Compliance
Under Tenney’s proposed legislation, the federal government would withhold 100% of federal highway funding from states issuing driver’s licenses or IDs to undocumented immigrants. The penalty would apply starting in fiscal year 2025 and continue annually. States that repeal such laws would be eligible to receive redistributed funding.
Supporters of the bill view it as a necessary step to enforce federal immigration laws and curb what they perceive as reckless state policies. Critics, however, argue that it unfairly punishes states and could undermine transportation infrastructure nationwide.
Heated Debate Over State and Federal Roles
The Green Light Law has faced backlash from law enforcement, who claim it hampers their ability to enforce immigration laws and threatens public safety. Some see the legislation as a symbol of defiance against federal immigration policies, while others argue it ensures the rights and dignity of undocumented residents.
With immigration remaining a divisive issue, the Red Light Act is expected to reignite debates about the balance of power between federal and state governments, as well as the role of sanctuary policies in modern America. Whether Tenney’s bill gains traction in Congress remains to be seen, but it is certain to stoke conversations across the political spectrum.
In the words of Tenney, “This legislation ensures states that refuse to comply with our nation’s immigration policies are not rewarded with federal funding.” For supporters and detractors alike, this statement encapsulates the core of the debate—a clash of priorities, values, and governance.
The battle over funding, policy, and immigration enforcement is far from over, as the Red Light Act brings these critical issues into the national spotlight once again.
GIPHY App Key not set. Please check settings