This Justice Department Report Is Hotter Than Ever – Jesse Watters Spills It All!

The Justice Department has unveiled a long-awaited report shedding new light on the events of January 6, 2021, at the U.S. Capitol. According to the findings, 26 confidential informants working with the FBI were present that day. Of these, four entered the Capitol building, and 13 others were in restricted areas around it. This report raises pressing questions about the FBI’s role and strategy during what has been labeled as an insurrection.

The report’s revelations, outlined by Jesse Watters on his show, highlight the distinction between undercover agents and confidential informants. Unlike full-time FBI agents, confidential informants are civilians who provide intelligence, often under pressure. Watters explained, “The FBI didn’t have undercover agents at January 6th. They had confidential human sources. So, what’s the difference? Well, a confidential human source doesn’t get health insurance or a pension. They’re just freelancing for the feds.”

The Role of FBI Informants

Confidential informants, or “human sources,” are typically civilians recruited by the FBI for information-gathering. While they’re not full-time employees, they are often coerced into cooperation, sometimes by threats of legal action. Watters further elaborated, “They get sat down, and the FBI says you’re going to work for me now. And if you don’t, you’re looking at 20 years to life.”

These informants are tasked with infiltrating groups and reporting back intelligence. According to Watters, they operate under intense pressure to provide actionable information and produce significant arrests that bolster the FBI’s public image. On January 6th, this approach appears to have placed informants directly within groups like the Proud Boys and others under federal scrutiny.

Forewarning Ignored?

The report also revealed that these informants warned the FBI of potential unrest ahead of January 6th. Watters claimed, “According to the inspector general report, the spies were feeding the FBI Intel that said January 6th was going to get a little hairy.” Despite these warnings, the event escalated into chaos, leaving many questioning how this intelligence was utilized—or whether it was ignored altogether.

The report indicates that at least some of the informants actively participated in the day’s events. Four entered the Capitol building itself, and others breached restricted areas surrounding the premises. These actions, combined with the informants’ role in gathering intelligence, complicate the narrative of the day’s events.

Accountability Under Scrutiny

The presence of informants raises important questions about transparency and accountability. Watters pointed out that the FBI and Justice Department have previously downplayed or outright denied the presence of undercover agents on January 6th. However, the distinction between agents and informants appears to be central to their defense.

Critics argue that the FBI’s reliance on informants for such a high-profile event exposes significant risks. These informants are often civilians with little training or oversight, increasing the chances of misconduct or escalation. The question remains: Did their presence help contain the situation, or did it inadvertently contribute to the chaos?

The Fallout

The Justice Department’s report has reignited debate about the role of federal law enforcement in politically charged events. For many, it raises uncomfortable questions about the extent of government involvement in January 6th and whether the use of informants blurred the lines between observation and participation.

As the conversation unfolds, the Justice Department and FBI may face increasing pressure to clarify their role in the events of that day. The report serves as a stark reminder of the complexity of modern law enforcement tactics and their implications for public trust.

While this report provides new details, it also leaves many questions unanswered. The full story of January 6th—and the FBI’s role in it—may take years to unravel, but the latest revelations are sure to keep the conversation alive.