Renowned journalist Katie Couric has taken aim at Vice President Kamala Harris for what she describes as a persistent failure to deliver clear and concise responses to critical questions. Couric’s comments, aired on her podcast Next Question with Katie Couric, highlighted her frustrations with Harris’ communication style, which she claimed has left many voters perplexed.
“I always find that people do better when they’re asked really challenging, pointed questions,” Couric said during a discussion with guest Jen Psaki, the former White House press secretary and current MSNBC host. “If you are giving them these almost weird, like, amorphous softballs, it’s really hard to kind of hone your message and be succinct and say what you really need to say.”
Frustration Over Missed Opportunities
Couric didn’t hold back as she recounted instances where Harris’ responses seemed to veer off course. “I also felt that, and again, I think [Harris] really did well in so many areas, but I was frustrated by her inability to really succinctly answer questions at times,” Couric noted, referencing a particular moment during a CNN town hall.
“She was asked about changing the Supreme Court,” Couric continued, “and she had an opportunity to talk about ethics and what, you know, [Justices Samuel] Alito and Clarence Thomas were doing. But she answered, like, in one sentence and then went on to something that had nothing to do with the question.”
The journalist’s frustration boiled over as she added, “You know, people notice that, and it’s like, ‘Answer the goddamn question, please!’”
A Campaign Strategy Gone Awry?
Couric also touched on Harris’ reluctance to engage with the media following her nomination as Biden’s running mate. For weeks, Harris refrained from doing interviews, a move Couric described as baffling. “What was that?” Couric asked Psaki, who speculated the campaign might have been prioritizing debate preparation.
“She should’ve been everywhere,” Couric remarked, expressing disbelief at the missed opportunity to connect with voters early on.
Harris’ communication struggles extended beyond missed interviews. Couric pointed to a cringeworthy moment on The View where Harris, when asked what she would do differently from the Biden administration, offered a vague response. “Not a thing comes to mind,” Harris had said, an answer Couric suggested was a wasted chance to establish her own platform.
A Fragile Political Landscape
Psaki offered insight into the broader political dynamics at play, noting the delicate situation surrounding Biden’s eventual withdrawal from the race. According to Psaki, Democratic power players like Nancy Pelosi urged Biden to step aside, creating an environment where Harris may have felt constrained.
“There was a ‘fragility’ around Biden,” Psaki explained, describing how Harris had to tread carefully as she positioned herself for the campaign. Despite the complexities, Couric suggested Harris could have better prepared for inevitable questions.
“If I were running for president, Jen, I would sit down with my brain trust, and I’d be like, ‘Okay, let’s play out these questions. What am I gonna say?’” Couric said. “I would have had a template that I would have carried around with me in every interview.”
A Call for Better Preparation
Couric’s comments reflect broader voter concerns about Harris’ ability to communicate effectively on the campaign trail. While praising Harris for her strengths, Couric’s critique underscores the importance of preparation and clarity in high-stakes political settings.
As the conversation on Next Question wrapped up, Couric summed up her thoughts candidly: “It just didn’t seem like that was done. Am I crazy?”
For many, Couric’s remarks resonate as a call for political leaders to prioritize transparency and directness—qualities that voters increasingly demand in today’s fast-paced, media-driven world.
GIPHY App Key not set. Please check settings