As President-elect Donald Trump gears up to enforce a robust immigration policy, he has appointed former acting ICE Director Tom Homan to lead the charge in reforming the nation’s immigration practices. Homan, who played a central role in Trump’s first term, is now set to oversee a new, ambitious deportation strategy. One of the more controversial elements of this plan may involve deporting entire families, including children born in the U.S., if the parents entered the country illegally.
In an interview with 60 Minutes, Homan suggested that deporting families together—even those with U.S.-born children—would provide a more effective approach to immigration enforcement. He argued that the presence of American-born children should not exempt families from deportation if the parents are in the country without documentation. “Families can be deported together,” Homan stated in the interview, adding, “[the parents] created that crisis.”
A Departure from Traditional Policies on Birthright Citizenship
If enforced, the proposed policy would mark a dramatic shift from previous U.S. immigration practices, which have traditionally acknowledged American-born children as citizens, regardless of their parents’ immigration status. Birthright citizenship, rooted in the 14th Amendment, has historically granted citizenship to children born on American soil, safeguarding them from deportation. Homan’s approach challenges this long-standing principle, potentially leaving families facing a legal battle over the constitutional rights of these children.
For immigration advocates and legal experts, the suggestion that children born in the U.S. could face deportation alongside their undocumented parents is particularly concerning. They argue that such a policy would be difficult to implement, given its likely clash with the 14th Amendment’s promise of birthright citizenship. Many believe it could spark numerous court challenges as well as public backlash.
The Goal of Family Unity Through Deportation
Homan’s plan highlights his belief that keeping families together through deportation serves the best interests of all involved, rather than separating parents from their children. The premise rests on the idea that undocumented parents brought their children into a legally complicated situation. Homan stated that families would remain intact, with children staying alongside their parents as they return to the parents’ country of origin. “Families can be deported together,” he said, indicating that it is the parents’ decision to bring their children into the situation.
This “family unity” approach, however, is expected to face legal challenges from immigrant advocacy groups, as well as political resistance. Critics argue that this strategy disregards the rights of American-born children and ignores the hardships such families may face in countries where these U.S.-born children have little connection or familiarity. Proponents of birthright citizenship view Homan’s policy as a direct attack on a constitutional principle, asserting that it violates the legal rights of those born on U.S. soil.
Legal Hurdles Ahead
While Homan’s proposal aligns with the broader immigration goals of the Trump administration, any attempts to enforce such a policy are expected to face scrutiny and resistance in the courts. The principle of birthright citizenship, rooted in the 14th Amendment, is one of the cornerstones of U.S. constitutional law. Any effort to deport American-born children as part of family deportation policies would likely prompt lawsuits challenging the move on constitutional grounds.
Political analysts predict this policy will spark debate not only in the courts but also within the U.S. population at large, where opinions on immigration and birthright citizenship are deeply divided. For many, the suggestion to remove children from the only country they’ve known feels excessive, while supporters argue it upholds the importance of immigration laws.
A Potential Path Forward for the Trump Administration
Homan’s remarks on family deportation illustrate a harder line on immigration than seen in recent administrations. His leadership at ICE during Trump’s first term was marked by a series of tough immigration enforcement actions. Now, with an even more assertive stance on family deportations, Homan and the administration are bracing for what will likely be a long battle to carry out this vision.
The path forward remains uncertain. As Homan takes the reins of Trump’s immigration agenda, his approach underscores the administration’s commitment to curbing illegal immigration—though not without fierce legal and political pushback. For now, the issue of deporting families with American-born children remains a contentious and unresolved question in the nation’s ongoing debate over immigration.
GIPHY App Key not set. Please check settings