A Russian drone strike hit a key border crossing between Ukraine and NATO member Romania, as reported by various sources. The attack occurred at the Orlivka-Isaccea checkpoint, a vital ferry link between Ukraine’s Odesa region and Romania. Following the strike, operations at the crossing were suspended, according to Ukraine’s State Border Guard Service.
Ukrainian customs posted on Telegram that ferry services were halted after “a night attack of the enemy.” However, by 11 a.m. local time, the checkpoint had reopened, and regular operations resumed.
Regional governor Oleh Kiper, also on Telegram, stated, “The Russians deliberately fired at the checkpoint, making it difficult for ordinary people to cross the border. This is terror against the civilian population.” He further added that law enforcement was documenting the aftermath of what he called another crime committed by Russian forces.
In addition to the strike on the border, the attack also hit port infrastructure in the Izmail district of Odesa. Two truck drivers were injured, and images shared by Kiper showed flames engulfing parts of the site.
This incident is part of a larger pattern of Russian drone and missile strikes affecting the region. Last month, Russian media outlet Verstka reported that missile and drone debris from Russian attacks had landed in NATO territories 20 times since the conflict escalated. Romanian areas near Ukraine’s Danube River ports, frequent targets for Russian strikes, have been hit 13 times.
Romania, part of the Bucharest 9, a coalition of Eastern European countries, has called for a “collective answer” from NATO in response to the drone threats. Despite this, there have been no official claims that Russia is intentionally targeting NATO member states with its drones.
NATO’s Article 5, which states that an attack on one member is considered an attack on all, remains a significant point of discussion. While this provision could invoke a united military response, no formal accusations have been made suggesting Russia’s deliberate targeting of NATO members.
Roger Hilton, a defense research fellow at the GLOBSEC think tank, commented on the complexity of NATO’s response to Russian drone activity. “Increased drone activity violating the air space of NATO Allies is a sensitive issue where finding a firm response is complicated by two issues— the threat of further escalation and incoming top-level political considerations,” he told Newsweek.
Hilton highlighted that while NATO possesses various ways to neutralize drones, including electronic warfare and kinetic systems, any response must be balanced with avoiding further conflict escalation. “The primary question that needs to be satisfied collectively is what allies want to accomplish with their subsequent strategy and tactics,” Hilton added.
While the drone strike at the Orlivka-Isaccea checkpoint was significant, it wasn’t an isolated event. Multiple regions in Ukraine have come under heavy attack recently. Ukrainian authorities reported that seven people were killed and 50 others injured in Russian strikes on Wednesday alone.
In Kharkiv Oblast, a guided aerial bomb attack injured five people, including a 14-year-old boy, in the town of Derhachi, according to Governor Oleh Syniehubov. Meanwhile, the city of Zaporizhzhia also faced severe attacks. Six guided bombs hit residential areas, killing one person and injuring 25 others, including three children, as reported by Governor Ivan Fedorov.
Ukraine’s air force claimed some success in defending against these attacks, stating that it had downed 11 of the 32 Shahed-type drones launched by Russia. Ten drones were reportedly “lost” due to electronic warfare measures, while four returned to Russian territory.
As these attacks continue to unfold, the risk of further escalation, particularly involving NATO member countries, remains a critical concern for global leaders and military strategists alike.
GIPHY App Key not set. Please check settings